The Myth of the Big Bang. Be it “nothingness” “pure energy” or all the mass of the universe bound in a totality of singularity, the foundations of the big bang theory completely collapse when we ask a single question: Why did it explode? Also: Why then and not before? From where did this pre-big bang energy/mass originate? Is not the mass of a universe compacted to the size of an atom still a universe? If all mass/energy existed before the big bang and we know not why it exploded, the theory …
Duration : 0:56:24
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
The theory of the …
The theory of the big bang was first proposed by a Catholic priest, its the story of Genesis masquerading as science, religion dressed up in the language of science.
This myth requires existence before the big bang, the IT which exploded–for the Catholic priest who proposed this myth that IT is god.
The universe is eternal, infinite & has no beginning & no end, which is why most of the known universe is missing & has not been observed.
The Big Bang is a myth created by a Catholic Priest.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
The universe is …
The universe is eternal and infinite. The big bang is a myth: religion masquerading as science.
This video was written, researched & created by Rhawn Joseph, Ph.D. Dr. Joseph has made major scientific discoveries which he published in prestigious scientific journals. He’s been invited to speak at University of California at Berkeley, et. al., his research papers reprinted by Harvard, et al., He is the author of best selling scientific scholarly books and has appeared on national TV and radio.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
The central point …
The central point of this video is: the origin, age, and nature of the universe is unknown. The evidence does not support the theory of the “big bang” but refutes it. We have observed only a small fraction of the cosmos which may be eternal, infinite. The evidence indicates the universe constantly recycles and gives birth to new stars, planets, and galaxies. If there was a big bang, it was relatively small, and one of numerous bangs which are like distant rain drops falling on an eternal sea.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Our apologies. …
Our apologies. We’ve created over 60 videos which have received 30,000 comments. We stopped accepting comments here as many were irrelevant, vile, absurd attacks about “god.” Obviously the god-haters & those with the IQ of a frog didn’t watch the video but had a hysterical reaction to the title. We constantly deleted vile attacks left by fools no different from religious fanatics, lurching from their caves, torches & pitchforks in hand, grunting in fear, attacking what they don’t understand.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
The logic of ” …
The logic of “cooling” after a “big bang” defies the laws of physics & the 1st & 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics.
Cooling occurs only via conduction, radiation, convection, or a combination of these.
Expanding Universe? A reduction in density reduces conduction: heat transfer stops. Conduction cannot occur in a vacuum.
Convection & Radiation = Heat Transfer.
Transfer to What, Where? To an area which is cool & not part of the hot.
The Big Bang is a Myth. Ignorance masquerading as science.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
The background …
The background radiation supports the big bang only if we suspend the laws of physics. The cosmic radiation permeating the universe (supposedly created by a superhot big bang), could have cooled only if it exchanged heat with something cold that was NOT created by a hot big bang, and only if this cold-something exists outside the known universe which is permeated by this radiation (a circle inside a circle). Conclusion: there was no big bang. The “known universe” is a fragment of the whole.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
The all-pervasive, …
The all-pervasive, but relatively cool cosmic background is described as evidence for expansion and the big bang which had to be very hot. Because it has cooled, therefore, the radiation is exchanging and transfering heat as the universe expands, with something very cold outside of the universe, for where else would this “cold” come from? Wouldn’t this outside become warmer, for where did the heat go? Yet, we are also told, there is no “outside” for this refutes the big bang expansion theories.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
The purpose of this …
The purpose of this video is to topple and shatter the idols worshipped by those who use the language of science to promote a religious myth, i.e. that the universe had a beginning and was created.
The hypothesis of a big bang does not promote science, but instead hinders true scientists from exploring other possibilities and advancing our knowledge and understanding of the true nature of the cosmos.
There was no big bang. The big bang is a faith-based myth: religion masquerading as science.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Be it “nothingness” …
Be it “nothingness” “pure energy” or all the mass of the universe bound in a totality of singularity, the foundations of the big bang theory completely collapse when we ask a single question: Why did it explode? Also: Why then and not before? From where did this pre-big bang energy/mass originate? Is not the mass of a universe compacted to atom size still a universe? If all mass/energy existed before the big bang and we know not why it exploded, the theory has no basis and must be rejected.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
OK I wouldn’t call …
OK I wouldn’t call it a proof of evolution but what about the vestigial appendage? If evolution doesn’t exist why do we have an appendix?
Also why not a comet? from what I understand geologists have found a layer of dust corresponding to about the right depth for the proposed time of impact. Also with your seashells argument, it called tectonics. What are mountains now weren’t always mountains they could have sea beds, or the shells could have been the result of glacial movement.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Doorway, I think I …
Doorway, I think I understand your idea which is, if I may, that science is bonded to religion through the very people that are exploring this realm and that this inherently makes the results of their study fall more under religion than science.
To this I must say that even though many scientists that you have quoted draw ties between to religion, I do not feel that their personal opinions or beliefs should drag their research more into the area of religion than of science.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
The problem we face …
The problem we face is that the universe is really really big, we don’t know the entirety of physics law, and we have been around for such a small span of time.
As a parody on a smaller scale this is kind of like arguing about the cause of a tsunami. Do you believe that nothing caused a massive wave? an effect with no cause? hmmm, this is obviously the work of Poseidon, the Kraken, or Aqua man.
Don’t take that example personally, I was only mocking the argument not you.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Big Bang theory is …
Big Bang theory is based on the fact that the universe is expanding - the expantion can be measured retroactively and thats how they know how long ago it was. Good rederic, but its your thinking that is mystical or magical
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Big Bang theory is …
Big Bang theory is based on the fact that the universe is expanding - the expantion can be measured retroactively and thats how they know how long ago it was. Good rederic, but its your thinking that is mystical or magical
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Noone can know that …
Noone can know that. Scientists at least explore products of creation. Religious peoples just believes in myth.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Now, david, don’t …
Now, david, don’t get all ‘bent” out of shape. Please, no more spaz attacks.
The above, coupled with your comments, are yet further proof you are 100% correct, i.e. you have an “IQ over 90.”
How does one spell ignorance?
like this: “davidbentleydesigns.”
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Theories of the Big …
Theories of the Big Bang / Accelerating universe are religion / creation science masquerading as
science:
“The question of ‘the beginning’ is as inescapable for cosmologists as it is for theologians…there
is no doubt that a parallel exists between the big bang as an event and the Christian notion of creation from nothing.” George Smoot, 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics for
discoveries related to the cosmic background radiation / big bang
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Theories of the Big …
Theories of the Big Bang / Accelerating universe are religion / creation science masquerading as
science:
“the universe was created out of nothing…and one which has an underlying (one might say ’supernatural’) plan.” Arno Penzias Nobel Prize for Physics in 1978 for discovery of the cosmic background radiation of the ‘big bang”
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Theories of the Big …
Theories of the Big Bang / Accelerating universe are religion / creation science masquerading as
science:
“It would be very difficult to explain why the universe should have begun in just this way, except
as the act of a God who intended to create beings like us.” Stephen Hawkins, a Brief History of Time
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Theories of the Big …
Theories of the Big Bang / Accelerating universe are religion masquerading as science:
“The essential element in the astronomical and biblical accounts of Genesis is the same: the chain
of events leading to man commenced suddenly, at a finite moment in time, in a flash of light and energy…the Hubble Law (describes the expansion of the universe)… is one of the main supports of the scientific story of Genesis.”
Robert Jastrow, Astronomer, First chairman of NASA’s Lunar Exploration Committee
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Continued…The …
Continued…The theory of the Big Bang event is NOT incompatible with religious belief, even the Vatican holds this to be true; in addition, the Vatican believes that the search for TRUTH in science, and in particular cosmology, only strengthens their foundation. That is why they have for centuries operated their own observatories with astronomers, and cosmologists. Science is based on testable theories supported by observations and should make predictions which can later be confirmed.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Door-fool, It’s not …
Door-fool, It’s not a leap to put al the garbage in the same waste bucket. Calling the field of cosmology and astrophysics a religion and not a science is patently ridiculous. Major advancements in the field using satellites such as K.O.B.E. and Deep Sky Imager have PROVEN that the big bang happened;moreover, M theory states that it did not happen out of nothingness, but in fact probably expands and contracts in a cycle ad infinitum-parallel to other dimensions when their membranes collide.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Our God the Father …
Our God the Father is the Alpha and the Omega, all Perfect and all Powerful. All things came from God, He is the Past, the Present and the Future. The Human mind cannot and will never ever measure the mind of God. God is Love
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Calm down, david. …
Calm down, david. Don’t get so hysterical. Just relax. You are safe now.
Now, don’t have another spaz attack, but shhhh, listen: this video does not promote “intelligent design.”
Now, don’t lose your panties, but, shhhh: this video shows how the theory of the “big bang” is in fact religion masquerading as science. This video is an attack on the nonscientific beliefs that support the big bang theory.
You claim to have an “I.Q over 90.” Your failure to understand this video proves it.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
…
Doorway2theidiotfarm-Obviously you can’t read, that is why your mommy put you in special ed-yes, your IQ is below 90, and yes you are retarded-best to run get mommy and have her r-e-a-d this for you. Note to your Mommy: I’m sorry my words were to big for your idiot son! Maybe next time you should send your kid to school instead of homeschooling with a silly thing like the bible and “intelligent design” (read about the city of Dover and it’s famous case protecting REAL science)-BYE, BYE LOSER!